Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Generic Drugs

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    277

    Generic Drugs

    We don't take many prescriptions, in fact the only one is for DW.

    So, we went to Costco Pharmacy to get it renewed. The Pharmacist looked at the renewal and told us that there was now a generic available-exactly the same- and did we want it. Yes of course we did. The price went down from $1.13 per pill to .36 per pill. Very convenient since we had just emptied our HSA entitlement and had to pay this ourselves.

    We were very pleased that the pharmacist mentioned this to us as I suspect that they make higher margins on the name brands.


  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,166
    Generally this will be the case until the drug patent expires.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Toronto.gal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    4,118
    Generics will become more profitable than brand name drugs as the latter, as Cal mentioned, lose patent protection. Recent examples:

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...449596184.html

    I personally would not have switched drugs without first asking my doctor. And btw, it's typical for pharmacists to pose that question, so I wouldn't give them any credits for that.
    “Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.”

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    277
    DW has a medical background. The generic has the exact composition of the patent. No issue. Had it not, we would definately had consulted the physician.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    626
    I actually have always gone for the generic brand until I spoke with the bf's brother who is in this business on the science side. He was saying that he could not believe the non-quality or low-quality crap that goes into the cheaper drugs in order to allow them to be cheap and advised not to buy no-name or low price necessarily.

    Cautionary takeaways:
    a. Price = quality; and
    b. Copycats may not mimic 100% the patented version.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    5,292
    ^ That's hard to believe.

    Price != quality-- at least not necessarily. You're paying for marketing and development costs with name brand drugs--who is to say there is any difference in marginal production cost of the drug itself.

    The recent change in regulations in Ontario have changed the incentives quite a bit for pharmacies. They used to earn a significant part of the operating income from what were essentially kickbacks from drug companies. I personally think that drugs should flow through pharmacies at manufacturer cost, and the cost of running the pharmacy paid out of dispensing fees.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Toronto.gal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    4,118
    “Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.”

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    5,292
    Thanks, T.gal. Good find.

  9. #9
    Senior Member MoneyGal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,660
    Canadian version on the same topic (i.e., bioequivalence):

    http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hl-vs/iyh-vsv...ed-gen-eng.php

  10. #10
    Senior Member MoneyGal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,660
    I took an *entire class* in grad school on generic drug policy and manufacturing patents (in the context of Canadian manufacturing and public policy). It was really, really eye-opening.


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •