Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Prepaid Cellphones Are Cheaper. Why Aren’t They Popular?

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    822
    I don't see why people feel the need to own $700 phones. I bought a $150 android smartphone and it runs everything I've installed from the google play store. Angry Birds Space runs smoothly. It's more powerful than the best phones of only 3 years ago, and in another 3 years you will be able to buy a low-end phone for $150 that will be more powerful than the best phones of today. If only well-off people bought $700 phones and bought them outright, we wouldn't have these ridiculous 3 year contracts, but the telecoms have managed to convince the masses that everyone needs a high end phone. I wouldn't even buy a car on a 3 year contract.


  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    558
    Quote Originally Posted by Sherlock View Post
    I don't see why people feel the need to own $700 phones. I bought a $150 android smartphone and it runs everything I've installed from the google play store. Angry Birds Space runs smoothly. It's more powerful than the best phones of only 3 years ago, and in another 3 years you will be able to buy a low-end phone for $150 that will be more powerful than the best phones of today. If only well-off people bought $700 phones and bought them outright, we wouldn't have these ridiculous 3 year contracts, but the telecoms have managed to convince the masses that everyone needs a high end phone. I wouldn't even buy a car on a 3 year contract.
    To each their own. There are plenty of things I do on my phone that wouldn't function nearly as well on a cheaper/older phone, such as trading and remote desktop access. Everyone values things differently. I think it's stupid to buy a $100 shirt or pair of jeans but it's ok to buy a $700 smartphone that adds a huge amount of productivity to my life, in addition to enjoyment. Others may feel the need to be stylish and buy fancy clothes but only have the need for a cheap phone. The problem is not with individual things - the problem is the mentality of some people where they simply have no idea how to save money and live paycheque to paycheque regardless of how much they make.

    Considering what you can do on a phone these days, I think it's fair value when looked at in a vacuum. Only when you compare voice and data rates and contracts in other countries does it seem ridiculous.

    The ability to talk, trade, e-mail, and access the internet and hundreds of thousands of apps is worth well over the $60/month that I pay, in addition to a new phone every couple of years. This is especially true if you get rid of your landline which typically costs at least $20/month.

  3. #13
    Senior Member mode3sour's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    DE
    Posts
    1,919
    Quote Originally Posted by Sherlock View Post
    I wouldn't even buy a car on a 3 year contract.
    Yet more of the masses buy brand new cars on 5 year 0.0% "free" financing that is the exact same ploy; getting more people to spend more money. Whether or not the extra cost is justified highly depends on the individual..... $150 android phone is probably a better value in the same way that nothing expensive is a good value if you don't appreciate/need the extra quality. They replace many expensive portable devices and for someone who travels or uses it for productivity you can easily justify the cost. $150 Android phone is not supported after a year or two and worthless by that time, whereas more expensive phones are supported for years and have a resale as well, but it's all just as irrelevant.

    Prepaid plans are a pretty good deal in Canada for all the young people who scarcely use voice or text anymore (can all be done on data..) especially if they bought an unlocked phone online for much less. In Europe if you take a "subsidized" phone plan the extra monthly cost is transparent in the plan. In Canada, everyone pays for subsidized phones collectively in some kind of huge price fixing scam you can't avoid. If you "bring your own device" in any other country besides US/Canada, you pay half the cost. In most countries, I can grab a prepaid sim in the airport for $20 that lasts me a month or two whereas in Canada the sim alone will cost you $25 activation.. In other news my Cdn telcos stocks are leading my gains
    Last edited by mode3sour; 2012-08-10 at 12:25 AM.
    When everyone thinks the same they don't think at all

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    143
    Quote Originally Posted by ddkay View Post
    This doesn't really apply to Canada, first and foremost because Canada uses 3Y contracts instead of 2Y. BellRobsUs will not sell you an iPhone on a plan for any less than $50/month. They will eat $490 of hw cost if you stay for 3 years, so take $13.61/mo away for 36 months. What prepaid plan features can you match 1:1 for $36.39? None that I know of... Even if you bring it to a flanker brand like Koodoo, an unlimited local/500MB LTE plan costs $55/month. Add in the cost of the phone you purchased again and that's over $70/month. Even if you bought the cheapest and crappiest phone, you can't win.

    If you go to Wind, it still makes more sense to use the tab/contract. Off contract customers are paying the same plan price as everyone else and not getting any hardware discount. Unless you are not staying in the country very long why would you go off contract? It's a lose lose situation for prepaid cell phone users in Canada, you are actually the most profitable.
    Actually the cell companies eat no cost what so ever. I pay 13 a month towards my phone, in addition to the 279 I initially paid. This works out to 750 bucks, exactly the cost of an iPhone.

    What sucks though is after the contract my bill doesn't go down 13 a month. Weird. I am interested on how you can go pay as you go on an iPhone?

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    791
    You buy the iPhone up front (I got mine from markways.com). Then you just get the SIM for Pay-as-you-go from Rogers or whoever, and bob's your uncle. If data is your concern, I'm not sure if you can get always-on data with pay as you go. But at least with Rogers, you can buy either 1 or 7 day data passes that give you a certain amount of MB, once you use up either your time or your MB you have to buy more. I have wifi at home and work, though, so I rarely need to use the data.

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    299
    Quote Originally Posted by Sherlock View Post
    I don't see why people feel the need to own $700 phones. I bought a $150 android smartphone and it runs everything I've installed from the google play store. Angry Birds Space runs smoothly. It's more powerful than the best phones of only 3 years ago, and in another 3 years you will be able to buy a low-end phone for $150 that will be more powerful than the best phones of today. If only well-off people bought $700 phones and bought them outright, we wouldn't have these ridiculous 3 year contracts, but the telecoms have managed to convince the masses that everyone needs a high end phone. I wouldn't even buy a car on a 3 year contract.
    Well, since my usage pretty much requires a contract, the $700 phone drops to only $100-200. If I went with a $500 phone, it's $0 out of pocket.
    What if the features I wanted aren't available on the older phone? 8mpixel camera, voice control, extra large HD screen?

    Why order steak, when ground beef is nutritionally the same? or a fresh apple rather than slurping sauce?
    Sometimes we pay a bit more just for the different experience.

    Finally buying a new 3 year old phone every year or two is more expensive than simply buying a new phone once.

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    5,290
    Matt, I hate to tell you, but your shiny new phone will be two years behind the curve in two years. Why would you be replacing a two year old phone every year? Are you saying iPhone 3 is rubbish and only good for a year?

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    299
    Quote Originally Posted by andrewf View Post
    Matt, I hate to tell you, but your shiny new phone will be two years behind the curve in two years. Why would you be replacing a two year old phone every year? Are you saying iPhone 3 is rubbish and only good for a year?
    The iPhone 3 is a piece of overpriced rubbish, but that aside I was explaining why some people want top end phones. Oh and you don't hate to tell me that my phone will be 2 years behind the curve in two years, you're trying to throw it in my face, guess what, in 2 years it will be 3 years from the hottest thing on the block. That doesn't change the fact that at the time I bought it, it was the right phone for me.

    I bought an expensive phone for the above reasons, and since I'm on a contract, the actual price I paid (above the contract) is less than a dollar a week. For the extra features it's worth it to me. Let me compare it to your iPhone 3.
    I have voice control & speech recognition, more storage plus an external SD card, bigger screen, bigger on screen keyboard, brighter screen, higher resolution screen, replaceable battery, better camera, free navigation software, lighter, faster processor and faster data network.

    Since those matter to me, I'll pay a few cents a day for them.

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    5,290
    That's your prerogative. I was making the point that a phone that is 18 months or 2 years old is far from useless, and could be a good choice for many if not most consumers.


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •