Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Portfolio composition: Bonds, ETFs, Funds, Stocks, Real estate

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,909
    Quote Originally Posted by kcowan View Post
    ... So tell us how much of your portfolio is made up in % of each:...

    I am interested in any feedback regarding these categories before we solicit input...
    Hmmm ... I'm not sure what perspective this will provide.

    Using the "income producing" category as an example - why is "RE - residence" included? For most people (i.e. are not renting out a room/garage or anything), the residence is a combination of "equity" and "expense", is it not?

    What's debt doing under "income producing"?

    How can an ETF be under both categories while preferred shares are supposedly only equity?


    When I get a chance I'll jump over to the original thread to see the specifics of the concern to see if that helps.


    Cheers


  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    A van down by the river
    Posts
    386
    Quote Originally Posted by Rusty O'Toole View Post
    Real estate - 70%
    No wonder you hate Garth Turner.

  3. #13
    Senior Member kcowan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Pacific latitude 20/49
    Posts
    3,173
    Quote Originally Posted by CanadianCapitalist View Post
    This is really a networth breakdown rather than investment portfolio breakdown, no? If that's the case, shouldn't we break out personal residence, cottage etc. from investment properties, REITs etc.
    I was thinking that big ticket items could be include as negative items under Income Producing, i.e. Income subtracting. So mortgage on house, margin account, and equivalent rent would be negative items. This last item is particularly true in Vancouver, Toronto and less so in Ottawa, Alberta but it does make you realize the exposure you carry in "excess" RE equity.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eclectic12 View Post
    Hmmm ... I'm not sure what perspective this will provide.

    Using the "income producing" category as an example - why is "RE - residence" included? For most people (i.e. are not renting out a room/garage or anything), the residence is a combination of "equity" and "expense", is it not?

    What's debt doing under "income producing"?

    How can an ETF be under both categories while preferred shares are supposedly only equity?


    When I get a chance I'll jump over to the original thread to see the specifics of the concern to see if that helps.


    Cheers
    See the above. As for splitting ETFs, I am OK with not doing that. After all dividend-paying stock could be under Income producing. In the old days, Income Producing would have been called Fixed Assets but bond ETFs changed that.

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    2,642
    50 per cent equities (primarily low-fee, broad-based ETF's)
    40 per cent bonds (primarily PH&N Bond Fund D)
    10 per cent cash (HISA)

    My next planned asset allocation change is to reduce my equity allocation to 40 per cent and increase my cash component to 20 per cent.

    Note: This is in consideration of my age (69).

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,165
    Equities 35% all Canadian dividend payors: pension 40%, DB non cola: personal use real estate 22%: cash 3% 62 years old retired 6 years. No debt ,no plans to change allocations.
    Last edited by Square Root; 2012-07-15 at 09:10 AM.

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    2,642
    Bonds outperforming equities again--still:

    http://www.moneyville.ca/article/123...ocks-this-year

    Also, investors moving away from individual stocks in favour of ETF's. I was ahead of my time!!!

    http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloom...at-3765328.php
    Last edited by Belguy; 2012-08-06 at 01:42 PM.

  7. #17
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    19
    75% equities
    25% bonds

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    2,642
    Age and risk tolerance are two factors that will determine the equity allocation in your portfolio.

    Some folks overestimate their tolerance for risk and only find out the hard way when there is a market crash.

  9. #19
    Administrator CanadianCapitalist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Posts
    2,382
    Quote Originally Posted by Belguy View Post
    Some folks overestimate their tolerance for risk and only find out the hard way when there is a market crash.
    Funny you should say that Belguy! )
    Canadian Capitalist -- Helping you invest & prosper

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    968
    Im can't be bothered to figure out exact % but my snapshot looks like this
    -Cash-20k
    -My ltd reg business-capital inside(obviously needs to be taxed)about 112k
    -255kish in stocks(about 30 different companies ala-rsp/tfsa/non reg
    -ongoing earnings about 25k gross profit a mth
    -zero/zilch debt
    -No bonds

    However i am still out of the re market/renter(- ownership in rio can)still a batchlor also & loving it lol
    Very likely(make that forsure)won't have any pension(My business will be-ie:employees)
    33yr old male.That's my full breakdown.


Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •