muf4evr
03-30-2010, 04:00 AM
Hey all,
New to the forum looking for some financial advice.
A little bio for those who didn't read my bio/background:
25yr old; full time student; full time work at minimum wage; opened an rrsp wit manulife through my employer last june; found your forum and thought i could pick some brains for greater financial knowledge.
So I decided to look at my portfolio online the other day (I haven't bothered to look since I filled out the necessary forms at work last June) and saw that my returns from June to December was 10% and looking at some pie chart on the site realized that I am a balanced investor (whatever that means). Feeling the urge to scratch my inquisitiveness I decided to browse through the site (most of the data I saw looks more like cuneiform than english to me) and also searched the web on RRSP and how I should design my portfolio.
I happened to stumble upon a couple of articles which adviced that young savers like myself should design a less risk adverse portfolio since I'm a long way from retiring.
The question I have for you wise sages is considering I got a 10% (I'm not even sure if 10% is a good return or not) return on a balanced portfolio last year in just 6 months should I change my portfolio strategy from a blanced to a growth or high risk.
I'll appreciate any constructive response and all are welcome to make smart, crude, or whatever comments about Windsor or Detroit.
Thanks
New to the forum looking for some financial advice.
A little bio for those who didn't read my bio/background:
25yr old; full time student; full time work at minimum wage; opened an rrsp wit manulife through my employer last june; found your forum and thought i could pick some brains for greater financial knowledge.
So I decided to look at my portfolio online the other day (I haven't bothered to look since I filled out the necessary forms at work last June) and saw that my returns from June to December was 10% and looking at some pie chart on the site realized that I am a balanced investor (whatever that means). Feeling the urge to scratch my inquisitiveness I decided to browse through the site (most of the data I saw looks more like cuneiform than english to me) and also searched the web on RRSP and how I should design my portfolio.
I happened to stumble upon a couple of articles which adviced that young savers like myself should design a less risk adverse portfolio since I'm a long way from retiring.
The question I have for you wise sages is considering I got a 10% (I'm not even sure if 10% is a good return or not) return on a balanced portfolio last year in just 6 months should I change my portfolio strategy from a blanced to a growth or high risk.
I'll appreciate any constructive response and all are welcome to make smart, crude, or whatever comments about Windsor or Detroit.
Thanks